According to @DowdEdward, social media platforms censored alternative narratives during Covid while allowing direct statements inciting violence to trend today, highlighting inconsistent content moderation (source: @DowdEdward on X, Sep 13, 2025). He states this is intended to divide the population and elicit emotional responses, framing the dynamic as deliberate rather than random enforcement (source: @DowdEdward on X, Sep 13, 2025). The post offers no market data or trading recommendations, so its trading relevance is limited to recognizing a sentiment headline around platform policy risk and polarization based solely on the author’s claims (source: @DowdEdward on X, Sep 13, 2025).

According to Vitalik Buterin, while he commends efforts to promote the free movement of people, he stresses the importance of maintaining a balanced tone in discussions and being cautious with the use of social media censorship. He argues that respecting free speech is crucial, even when the speech is disagreeable, as the control of censorship tools can shift and further use can lead to a polarized or uniform public discourse.