Place your ads here email us at info@blockchain.news
tolerant minority Flash News List | Blockchain.News
Flash News List

List of Flash News about tolerant minority

Time Details
2025-09-15
06:09
Adam Back X Post on Policy Limits: 'Tolerant Minority Sets Policy Limits' Signals No Direct Trading Guidance

According to @adam3us, the statement shared was: 'the tolerant minority sets policy limits.' Source: Adam Back on X, Sep 15, 2025, https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/1967470931502383467 The post contains no mention of specific assets, price targets, catalysts, or timelines, providing no direct trading signal for crypto markets. Source: Adam Back on X, Sep 15, 2025, https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/1967470931502383467 It reads as high-level policy commentary without actionable trade parameters such as entry level, stop-loss, or timeframe. Source: Adam Back on X, Sep 15, 2025, https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/1967470931502383467

Source
2025-09-15
05:39
Adam Back: Tolerant Minority Sets Bitcoin Policy Limits; Knots Policies Ineffective Before and After Bitcoin Core 30 — BTC Trading Implications

According to @adam3us, censorship-resistant network dynamics mean a tolerant minority sets effective policy limits, and preferential peering amplifies this, making Bitcoin Knots node policies almost completely ineffective already and both before and after the Bitcoin Core 30 release, indicating minimal change to BTC transaction relay and mempool policy from Knots-driven attempts; Source: Adam Back on X, Sep 15, 2025: https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/1967463326319104053. For BTC traders, this signals sustained censorship resistance and continuity of relay behavior around the Core 30 timeline, reducing near-term network-policy risk relative to Knots-specific settings; Source: Adam Back on X, Sep 15, 2025: https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/1967463326319104053.

Source
2025-09-14
00:52
Preferential Peering Shifts Network Relay Policy: Tolerant Minority Sets Limits — Trading Impact and Execution Risks

According to @adam3us, the network policy Schelling point for transaction relaying has shifted, with a tolerant minority now setting a more permissive relay limit through preferential peering, source: @adam3us on X, Sep 14, 2025. This change indicates relay behavior is no longer anchored by the prior default node policy, increasing heterogeneity in propagation across peering clusters that traders must account for in on-chain execution, source: @adam3us on X, Sep 14, 2025. Latency-sensitive strategies should assume uneven mempool visibility and variable relay speeds between clusters and adjust fee models, routing, and timing to manage slippage and arbitrage risk, source: @adam3us on X, Sep 14, 2025. Risk monitoring should include multi-peer propagation checks and cross-cluster mempool sampling to detect relay bottlenecks before submitting time-critical orders, source: @adam3us on X, Sep 14, 2025.

Source