According to @AltcoinGordon, Alex from Blackrock burned another 0.5% of the $SWIF token supply, shared via an X post that tagged @sheepwifhatcoin and included an image, source: @AltcoinGordon on X, August 22, 2025. The cited post does not include a transaction hash, chain details, block explorer link, or an official issuer confirmation, so the burn remains unverified within the source, source: @AltcoinGordon on X. Based on the information provided in the post, traders seeking to act on this claim would need on-chain confirmation of a burn address inflow and an issuer update to validate a 0.5% reduction in circulating supply before making trading decisions, source: @AltcoinGordon on X.

According to @AltcoinGordon, a person described as high up at BlackRock has allegedly burned 6% of $SWIF’s supply and is considering burning more next week, as stated in a public X post on Aug 15, 2025 (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 15, 2025). The post provides no wallet address, transaction hash, or official confirmation from BlackRock or the SWIF project, leaving the claim unverified at the time of posting (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 15, 2025). For trading, participants should wait for on-chain proof of any burn (e.g., verifiable burn wallet activity or supply reduction) or an official team statement before acting on the claim (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 15, 2025).

According to @AltcoinGordon, $SWIF has held strong after a reported 'matrix attack' and remains around a $4M market cap, highlighting resilience in this microcap memecoin, source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 15, 2025. The post explicitly labels this as 'incredible strength,' with the trading-relevant datapoint being the approximately $4M market cap level cited by the source, source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 15, 2025.

According to @AltcoinGordon, the correction specifies the burn figure as another 2% for SWIF, not and other, clarifying the intended percentage for traders tracking supply changes; source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 14, 2025. According to @AltcoinGordon, Alex said he might burn more $SWIF next week, signaling a potential additional burn event pending confirmation; source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 14, 2025. According to @AltcoinGordon, traders should monitor official announcements and on-chain records next week to verify timing and size of any further SWIF burns; source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 14, 2025.

According to @AltcoinGordon, an individual described as "Alex" at BlackRock has burned another 2% of the $SWIF supply valued at over $150,000, bringing the alleged cumulative burn to 6% (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 14, 2025). The post does not include a transaction hash, burn wallet, contract address, or official confirmation from BlackRock or the project, so the claim remains unverified at this time (source: @AltcoinGordon on X). Token burns permanently reduce circulating supply and can affect liquidity and volatility; traders should independently verify via the project’s official channels and on-chain explorers before positioning (source: Binance Academy — What Is a Token Burn; source: @sheepwifhatcoin on X for project updates). If confirmed, a 2% supply reduction could influence order book depth and slippage; monitor spot volume, spreads, and large-holder concentration around any verified burn event for trading signals (source: Binance Academy — Liquidity and Order Books; source: @AltcoinGordon on X).

According to @AltcoinGordon, a huge sell-off hit SWIF and he shared a long-form research link examining what caused the move. Source: https://twitter.com/AltcoinGordon/status/1955595337663496597 He states there was malicious activity involved in the event and publicly denies any personal involvement after receiving accusations. Source: https://twitter.com/AltcoinGordon/status/1955595337663496597 Regulators warn that manipulation and fraud in digital-asset markets are material risks that can trigger sudden price moves and losses, affecting liquidity and volatility. Sources: https://www.cftc.gov/LearnAndProtect/AdvisoriesAndArticles/CustomerAdvisory_PumpDump.html

According to @AltcoinGordon, $SWIF’s market cap ran from about $30,000 to $30,000,000 in seven days and is now roughly $8,000,000, highlighting extreme short-term volatility, source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 12, 2025. Based on those figures, the move equates to an approximate 1000x run-up from base to peak, followed by a roughly 73 percent drawdown to current, while still up about 266x from the initial level, source: @AltcoinGordon. The author alleges the decline was coordinated and planned, which, if accurate, would elevate manipulation risk considerations for entries, exits, and liquidity in $SWIF; however, the post provides no on-chain or order book evidence for the claim, source: @AltcoinGordon. For traders, the current level near $8,000,000 serves as a practical reference for risk framing after the reported parabolic cycle and subsequent drawdown, source: @AltcoinGordon.

According to @AltcoinGordon, $SWIF is up 50x in one week from his initial call, and he states he has not sold any and bought more on the dip on Aug 12, 2025, signaling continued personal exposure to the token, source: @AltcoinGordon on X (Aug 12, 2025). According to the U.S. SEC Office of Investor Education and Advocacy and the CFTC, rapid multi-bagger moves combined with public endorsements are environments associated with elevated volatility and significant drawdown risk in crypto trading, source: U.S. SEC Investor Alerts on social-media promotions and celebrity endorsements; CFTC Customer Advisory on virtual currency risks. According to the UK FCA and FINRA, traders should apply strict risk controls (position sizing, slippage limits, stop-loss discipline) and independently verify price, volume, and liquidity on official exchange feeds or blockchain explorers before acting on promotional statements, source: UK FCA consumer warning on high‑risk cryptoassets (2021) and FINRA investor alerts on crypto asset claims.

According to @AltcoinGordon, $SWIF faced a coordinated sell-off and FUD that pulled its valuation to the $10M level, signaling an aggressive but contained drawdown in a highly volatile micro-cap move (source: @AltcoinGordon). According to @AltcoinGordon, the token is up over 300x in seven days, rising from around $30k last week to roughly $10M before the pullback, highlighting extreme momentum characteristics (source: @AltcoinGordon). According to @AltcoinGordon, the current drop is presented as a dip-buy opportunity for sidelined traders, with the assertion that the run is only warming up and momentum could continue (source: @AltcoinGordon).

According to @AltcoinGordon, he reported a "Matrix attack" on $SWIF and asserted "They will not win" — source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 12, 2025. The post explicitly references the ticker $SWIF but provides no additional details or evidence regarding the alleged attack — source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 12, 2025. This communication introduces headline risk that can draw short-term trader attention to SWIF price action and liquidity — source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 12, 2025.

According to @AltcoinGordon, $SWIF has reached 9,000 holders and the author asked if the community can push to 10,000 today (source: @AltcoinGordon, Aug 12, 2025). The post also shares the token address 9hdynudAhhWzuNFAnpz7NjvdKMfh9z8mcZKNYHuAUgJQ for on-chain verification by traders (source: @AltcoinGordon, Aug 12, 2025). No price, market cap, or volume metrics were provided in the post, limiting the update to holder count and the token address for trading due diligence (source: @AltcoinGordon, Aug 12, 2025).

According to @AltcoinGordon, an X post claims that 4% of $SWIF’s supply was burned and would now be valued at over $1,000,000, implying a material cut to circulating supply if confirmed, source: @AltcoinGordon on X. Token burns reduce available float and can amplify price volatility in low-liquidity markets, so traders typically seek on-chain confirmation via the token contract and burn address before positioning, source: Binance Academy and Etherscan Knowledge Base.

According to @AltcoinGordon, many $TROLL and $PENGU holders are entering $SWIF now, indicating fresh participation flowing into the token, source: @AltcoinGordon on X. According to @AltcoinGordon, traders are watching whether $SWIF can hit a $20M market cap today as highlighted by the author, source: @AltcoinGordon on X.

According to @AltcoinGordon, Dogwifhat (WIF) is cited at a $1B market cap, TROLL at $200M, and SWIF at $10M, framing a relative-value comparison across meme coins for trading attention. Source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 10, 2025. The author explicitly signals anticipated upside for SWIF with the statement "Much higher for the sheep!", positioning SWIF as undervalued versus WIF and TROLL within his post. Source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 10, 2025. The post also includes the string "9hdynudAhhWzuNFAnpz7NjvdKMfh9z8mcZKNYHuAUgJQ" and an image, shared as part of the same call-out, indicating a promotional-style signal rather than independently verified figures. Source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 10, 2025.

According to @AltcoinGordon, SWIF has delivered a 69x return in four days and the post signals further upside with the phrase we are only warming up, source: @AltcoinGordon on X, 2025-08-10. The post does not share the token contract address, market cap, liquidity, time-series price data, or exchange listings, so the claimed performance cannot be independently verified from the post alone, source: @AltcoinGordon on X, 2025-08-10. For trading decisions, users would need to verify on-chain price history, circulating supply, and liquidity depth externally because these metrics are absent from the post, source: @AltcoinGordon on X, 2025-08-10. The tone of the post is promotional and it does not include risk disclosures, source: @AltcoinGordon on X, 2025-08-10.

According to @AltcoinGordon, SWIF saw another 2% token burn valued at nearly $400,000, signaling a fresh supply-reduction catalyst for traders (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 10, 2025). No on-chain transaction hash or burn address was provided in the post, so traders should verify the burn amount and address on-chain before taking positions to confirm the event and its size (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 10, 2025). If confirmed on-chain, reduced float can affect liquidity and price formation, so monitoring SWIF liquidity pools and centralized exchange order books for changes in depth, spreads, and slippage is prudent (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 10, 2025).

According to @AltcoinGordon, the market is watching whether $SWIF can flip $BOSS in the next 24 hours, raising the question of short-term memecoin market cap leadership. source: @AltcoinGordon, X, Aug 10, 2025 The post provides no price, market cap, or volume figures, so traders must independently verify real-time circulating market cap, 24h volume, and DEX liquidity for $SWIF and $BOSS to confirm any flippening. sources: @AltcoinGordon, X, Aug 10, 2025; DEXTools; CoinGecko A flippening would be evidenced by $SWIF’s circulating market cap exceeding $BOSS while sustaining higher 24h turnover and sufficient liquidity depth to limit slippage. sources: CoinGecko methodology; DEXTools liquidity data Practical checks include tracking the $SWIF/$BOSS market cap ratio crossing 1.0, 24h volume leadership, top-holder accumulation, and whale inflows via on-chain analytics. sources: CoinGecko; DEXTools; Nansen

According to @AltcoinGordon, $SWIF saw its first notable pullback a few hours after touching $10M, with the author calling for consolidation before another attempt to push above the $10M level (source: @AltcoinGordon). The same source adds that $TROLL, a project from the same developers, is currently just under $200M and asks whether resistance can be broken today (source: @AltcoinGordon). For traders, the immediate actionable focus is the $10M threshold as resistance for $SWIF and the market-cap comparison to $TROLL, as framed by the author (source: @AltcoinGordon).

According to @AltcoinGordon, $TROLL’s market cap is under $250M, source: @AltcoinGordon on X (Aug 9, 2025). According to @AltcoinGordon, the TROLL developers’ other token $SWIF is rising toward an $8M market cap, source: @AltcoinGordon on X (Aug 9, 2025). According to @AltcoinGordon, a sub-$10M valuation for $SWIF is characterized as attractive, source: @AltcoinGordon on X (Aug 9, 2025). According to @AltcoinGordon, the post references @sheepwifhatcoin and includes the address 9hdynudAhhWzuNFAnpz7NjvdKMfh9z8mcZKNYHuAUgJQ, source: @AltcoinGordon on X (Aug 9, 2025).