According to @AltcoinGordon, SWIF shows perceived herd behavior, as he posted “Seems sheep here $SWIF” on X. Source: @AltcoinGordon on X, 2025-08-17. The post conveys a cautionary sentiment toward short-term entries in SWIF due to perceived crowding, with no price levels, metrics, or catalysts provided. Source: @AltcoinGordon on X, 2025-08-17. Traders considering this a sentiment-only signal should note the absence of additional context or data in the source post. Source: @AltcoinGordon on X, 2025-08-17.

According to @AltcoinGordon, a double bottom has formed on SWIF and the post asks if it is time to run it back, highlighting a potential rebound setup on the attached chart, source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 17, 2025. According to @AltcoinGordon, the post explicitly references the ticker SWIF and includes the string 9hdynudAhhWzuNFAnpz7NjvdKMfh9z8mcZKNYHuAUgJQ alongside the chart, source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 17, 2025.

According to @AltcoinGordon, an additional 0.6% of the SWIF token supply was burned, bringing the reported weekly total to 6.6%; source: @AltcoinGordon on X, August 16, 2025. According to @AltcoinGordon, the post tags @sheepwifhatcoin and includes the string 9hdynudAhhWzuNFAnpz7NjvdKMfh9z8mcZKNYHuAUgJQ as a reference; source: @AltcoinGordon on X, August 16, 2025. According to @AltcoinGordon, the update suggests a potential move toward a 10% weekly burn, framed as a question in the post; source: @AltcoinGordon on X, August 16, 2025. According to @AltcoinGordon, no on-chain explorer link is provided in the text excerpt here, making the post itself the sole cited evidence at this time; source: @AltcoinGordon on X, August 16, 2025. According to @AltcoinGordon, if the claimed 6.6% weekly burn is accurate, it would represent a significant short-term supply contraction that traders may factor into liquidity and price dynamics for SWIF; source: implication based on the reported percentages by @AltcoinGordon on X, August 16, 2025.

According to @AltcoinGordon, a person described as high up at BlackRock has allegedly burned 6% of $SWIF’s supply and is considering burning more next week, as stated in a public X post on Aug 15, 2025 (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 15, 2025). The post provides no wallet address, transaction hash, or official confirmation from BlackRock or the SWIF project, leaving the claim unverified at the time of posting (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 15, 2025). For trading, participants should wait for on-chain proof of any burn (e.g., verifiable burn wallet activity or supply reduction) or an official team statement before acting on the claim (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 15, 2025).

According to @AltcoinGordon, comparing $SWIF moving from $30M to $10M with a coin dropping from $170M to $100K conflates very different loss magnitudes and is not the same event for traders (source: @AltcoinGordon on X). Based on the figures in the post, $30M→$10M reflects a 66.7% decline, while $170M→$100K reflects a 99.94% collapse, indicating materially different drawdown profiles (source: @AltcoinGordon on X). Using the same figures, recovering from $10M back to $30M requires a 200% gain, whereas $100K back to $170M requires roughly a 169,900% move, underscoring non-equivalent recovery math for position sizing and risk management (source: @AltcoinGordon on X). For trading decisions on SWIF and similar altcoins, the actionable takeaway is to compare percentage drawdowns and required recovery multiples rather than relying on visual chart similarity alone (source: @AltcoinGordon on X).

According to @AltcoinGordon, $SWIF’s market cap ran from about $30,000 to $30,000,000 in seven days and is now roughly $8,000,000, highlighting extreme short-term volatility, source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 12, 2025. Based on those figures, the move equates to an approximate 1000x run-up from base to peak, followed by a roughly 73 percent drawdown to current, while still up about 266x from the initial level, source: @AltcoinGordon. The author alleges the decline was coordinated and planned, which, if accurate, would elevate manipulation risk considerations for entries, exits, and liquidity in $SWIF; however, the post provides no on-chain or order book evidence for the claim, source: @AltcoinGordon. For traders, the current level near $8,000,000 serves as a practical reference for risk framing after the reported parabolic cycle and subsequent drawdown, source: @AltcoinGordon.

According to @AltcoinGordon, SWIF moved from $30K to $30M within seven days and then pulled back to around $5M after what he describes as being rugged (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 12, 2025). According to @AltcoinGordon, he remains involved and asserts that SWIF is alive and well, indicating continued engagement from a prominent holder or advocate (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 12, 2025). Based on the figures cited by @AltcoinGordon, the swing from $30M to ~$5M signals extreme short-term volatility that traders should factor into position sizing, slippage tolerance, and risk controls if trading SWIF (source: figures from @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 12, 2025). According to @AltcoinGordon, the post references @sheepwifhatcoin, highlighting the account associated with SWIF for ongoing updates (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 12, 2025).

According to @AltcoinGordon, SWIF rose from $160K to over $10M within one week following what he describes as an attack on the project (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 12, 2025). The quoted figures imply approximately a 62.5x week-over-week increase based on the values he provided (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 12, 2025; calculation from cited numbers). He further states "we are only just beginning" and alleges opponents are trying to stop his influence, signaling his intention to continue driving attention to SWIF (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 12, 2025). For trading context, the post provides a timeframe, relative scale of the move, and a claim of an attack, which are the only verifiable details from this source and should be cross-checked against on-chain and market data before positioning (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 12, 2025).

According to @AltcoinGordon, SWIF ($SWIF) is starting to get exchange listings, as stated in an X post tagging @sheepwifhatcoin on Aug 12, 2025; source: @AltcoinGordon on X. No specific exchanges were named in the post, so traders should seek confirmation via official exchange announcements and live order books before taking positions; source: @AltcoinGordon on X. The project identifier referenced is SWIF ($SWIF), and the official handle mentioned is @sheepwifhatcoin; source: @AltcoinGordon on X.

According to @AltcoinGordon, SWIF is ranked in the 1H, 24H, and 7-day top trending tokens on Phantom, with the post referencing @sheepwifhatcoin as the project account (source: https://twitter.com/AltcoinGordon/status/1955135105971720225). No price, volume, or market cap details were provided in the post, limiting further quantitative analysis from this source alone (source: https://twitter.com/AltcoinGordon/status/1955135105971720225).

According to @AltcoinGordon, $SWIF has surpassed 8,000 holders after being under 100 just a week ago (source: @AltcoinGordon). The author also asks if the community can reach 10,000 holders by tomorrow, highlighting an aggressive near-term growth goal (source: @AltcoinGordon). For trading, the reported surge in wallet count can signal accelerating participation that may impact liquidity depth and short-term volatility; traders should monitor on-chain holder growth, DEX liquidity, and volume to confirm momentum before entries (growth claim source: @AltcoinGordon). These figures are self-reported on social media and should be independently verified on-chain prior to trading decisions (reported metrics source: @AltcoinGordon).

According to @AltcoinGordon, he previously promoted SWIF at $160K, $1M, and $2M and later identified a "perfect entry point" at $9M, providing specific price-level markers for traders tracking the asset (Source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 11, 2025). According to @AltcoinGordon, his stated intent is to help followers make money from the trade, emphasizing those four reference levels as actionable cues shared in his post (Source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 11, 2025).

According to @AltcoinGordon, SWIF is currently at a cited $12M level and needs to reach $16M within 48 hours for him to claim a 100x call achieved in under a week (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 11, 2025). According to the same source, the move from $12M to $16M implies roughly a 33% additional upside to the stated target within the 2-day window (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 11, 2025). According to the source, the post references the SWIF ticker and mentions the project handle @sheepwifhatcoin without specifying whether the $12M and $16M figures denote market cap or another valuation metric (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 11, 2025).

According to @AltcoinGordon, Dogwifhat (WIF) is cited at a $1B market cap, TROLL at $200M, and SWIF at $10M, framing a relative-value comparison across meme coins for trading attention. Source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 10, 2025. The author explicitly signals anticipated upside for SWIF with the statement "Much higher for the sheep!", positioning SWIF as undervalued versus WIF and TROLL within his post. Source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 10, 2025. The post also includes the string "9hdynudAhhWzuNFAnpz7NjvdKMfh9z8mcZKNYHuAUgJQ" and an image, shared as part of the same call-out, indicating a promotional-style signal rather than independently verified figures. Source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 10, 2025.

According to @AltcoinGordon, dip entries on SWIF are being bought up rapidly, indicating shallow pullbacks and fast absorption of sell pressure; traders on the sidelines are urged to watch closely, source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 10, 2025. No specific price levels, timeframes, or order sizes were disclosed in the post, limiting visibility into exact execution zones for SWIF, source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 10, 2025. The author’s note to keep eyes peeled underscores a momentum-style environment where dips may be short-lived for SWIF, source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 10, 2025.

According to @AltcoinGordon, SWIF saw another 2% token burn valued at nearly $400,000, signaling a fresh supply-reduction catalyst for traders (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 10, 2025). No on-chain transaction hash or burn address was provided in the post, so traders should verify the burn amount and address on-chain before taking positions to confirm the event and its size (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 10, 2025). If confirmed on-chain, reduced float can affect liquidity and price formation, so monitoring SWIF liquidity pools and centralized exchange order books for changes in depth, spreads, and slippage is prudent (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 10, 2025).

According to @AltcoinGordon, a contact he describes as senior at BlackRock burned 2% of the SWIF supply and may conduct additional burns soon (source: @AltcoinGordon). For traders, this post flags a potential supply-contraction narrative for SWIF that could affect short-term liquidity and price discovery if on-chain confirmation emerges; monitoring circulating supply changes, DEX liquidity depth, and intraday volatility after the claim is prudent (source: @AltcoinGordon). The post provides no on-chain transaction details or issuer confirmation to independently verify the burn at this time (source: @AltcoinGordon).

According to @AltcoinGordon, SWIF has pulled back and he describes the move as a perfect entry for traders who were sidelined; source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 9, 2025. The post tags the project account @sheepwifhatcoin and includes the string 9hdynudAhhWzuNFAnpz7NjvdKMfh9z8mcZKNYHuAUgJQ, reinforcing that the comment targets SWIF; source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 9, 2025. The post does not specify price levels, timeframes, or risk parameters for the suggested entry; source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 9, 2025.

According to @AltcoinGordon, the SWIF dip was being bought up quickly, signaling active buy-side liquidity absorbing the pullback (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 9, 2025). According to @AltcoinGordon, this rapid absorption indicates a narrow entry window for sidelined traders and near-term support from aggressive dip buyers (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 9, 2025).