According to @ai_9684xtpa, roughly two hours before the post the WLFI official multisig transferred 17.625 billion WLFI to contract 0xFef...b14B4 and then sent 5 billion WLFI back to the multisig, with a net 12.625 billion WLFI remaining at the contract based on the reported figures, source: @ai_9684xtpa. The author notes this was the largest single transaction from that address in 11 months and states the contract’s purpose is currently unknown, source: @ai_9684xtpa. The author adds that pre-TGE on-chain updates will be maintained in a thread under the original post, with major items posted separately, source: @ai_9684xtpa. For traders, the flagged addresses to monitor ahead of TGE are the WLFI official multisig and contract 0xFef...b14B4 for subsequent token movements, source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @milesdeutscher, a 3 of 5 multisig Solana transaction has been successfully executed, with transaction details verified on Solscan at tx/cCbHKEz2xGP (source: Twitter, Solscan). This activity highlights increased whale movement and secure transfer practices on the Solana blockchain, offering traders insight into significant account actions and the use of multisig authentication for enhanced security. Monitoring such large-scale transfers can provide valuable signals for short-term volatility and liquidity opportunities in the SOL market.

According to ZachXBT, the funds in the multisig wallet are secure and have not been stolen, suggesting a potential opportunity for stakeholders to reclaim their stablecoins.

According to ZachXBT, the funds remain secure within the multisig wallet, indicating they have not been stolen despite the passage of significant time. ZachXBT suggests that it would be prudent to allow stakeholders to reclaim their stablecoins, which could influence trading decisions on these assets.

According to ZachXBT, the funds are still secured in the multisig wallet and have not been stolen. Despite the time elapsed, there is a suggestion that users should be allowed to reclaim their stablecoins.

According to VitalikButerin, he emphasizes the importance of moving the user interface (UI) to a .eth/IPFS site. This shift would allow for version control directly on-chain using multisig, enhancing protection against hacks.