Tether Co-Founder Explains Why Banks Are Targeting Stablecoins | Flash News Detail | Blockchain.News
Latest Update
2/24/2026 6:31:00 PM

Tether Co-Founder Explains Why Banks Are Targeting Stablecoins

Tether Co-Founder Explains Why Banks Are Targeting Stablecoins

According to Michaël van de Poppe, Reeve Collins, the co-founder of Tether and STBL, discussed the challenges stablecoins face from banks and their potential future. Collins highlighted that banks are lobbying against yield-bearing stablecoins to protect their own interests. He introduced the concept of Stablecoin 2.0, which aims to redistribute yield back to users rather than issuers. Additionally, Collins warned about the control governments may exert through CBDCs and explored how AI agents could revolutionize wallet management and transactions. The discussion also analyzed the failure of algorithmic stablecoins like Terra Luna.

Source

Analysis

Why Banks Are Battling Stablecoins: Tether Co-Founder's Warning and Crypto Trading Implications

In a revealing interview, Reeve Collins, co-founder of Tether and STBL, sheds light on the intensifying clash between traditional banks and the stablecoin ecosystem. According to Collins in his discussion with crypto analyst Michaël van de Poppe, banks are aggressively lobbying to block yield-bearing stablecoins, fearing they could render traditional checking accounts obsolete. This narrative underscores a pivotal shift in the cryptocurrency market, where stablecoins like USDT are not just digital dollars but evolving into yield-generating assets. For traders, this highlights potential volatility in stablecoin-related tokens and pairs, as regulatory pressures could influence liquidity and trading volumes across major exchanges. With stablecoins anchoring over 90% of crypto trading pairs, any disruption could ripple through BTC/USDT or ETH/USDT markets, creating short-term selling opportunities or dips to buy.

Collins emphasizes the advent of Stablecoin 2.0, which redirects yields back to users rather than issuers, potentially democratizing finance and challenging banking monopolies. This innovation could boost adoption of stablecoins in decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols, where traders might see increased on-chain activity and higher trading volumes in pairs involving USDC or emerging yield-bearing variants. From a trading perspective, monitor resistance levels around key stablecoin market caps; for instance, Tether's USDT has maintained dominance with a market cap exceeding $100 billion as of recent data, but lobbying efforts might introduce downside risks. Traders should watch for correlations with broader crypto sentiment— if banks succeed in curbing yields, it could dampen enthusiasm for DeFi tokens like AAVE or UNI, leading to potential pullbacks below support levels such as $150 for UNI in the coming weeks.

CBDCs vs. Stablecoins: Government Control and Market Risks

The conversation also delves into Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), which Collins warns could grant governments unprecedented control over personal finances, contrasting sharply with the user-centric model of stablecoins. This raises red flags for crypto traders, as CBDC advancements might accelerate regulatory crackdowns on private stablecoins, affecting global trading flows. In markets like BTC and ETH, where stablecoins facilitate seamless conversions, such developments could spike volatility; historical patterns show that regulatory news often triggers 5-10% swings in major pairs within 24 hours. Institutional flows, already pouring into spot Bitcoin ETFs, might pivot towards safer assets if stablecoin yields are restricted, potentially supporting gold-backed cryptos or even altcoins with privacy features like XMR.

Addressing past failures, Collins reflects on the Terra Luna collapse, attributing it to flaws in algorithmic stablecoins that lacked sufficient collateralization. This lesson is crucial for traders eyeing similar projects—avoid high-risk entries without verifying on-chain metrics like reserve ratios and liquidation volumes. Looking ahead, the integration of AI agents to manage wallets and execute transactions, as discussed, could revolutionize trading strategies. AI-driven tools might optimize entries in volatile pairs, such as SOL/USDT, by analyzing real-time sentiment and volume spikes. For stock market correlations, stablecoin disruptions could influence tech stocks like those in fintech (e.g., PYPL or SQ), creating cross-market arbitrage opportunities where crypto dips align with stock rallies amid banking sector uncertainty.

AI Agents and the Future of Crypto Trading

Finally, the role of AI in crypto wallets signals a new era for automated trading, where agents could handle complex strategies, reducing human error and enhancing efficiency in high-frequency trading. This ties into AI tokens like FET or AGIX, which might see upside momentum if stablecoin innovations incorporate AI for yield optimization. Traders should track trading volumes in these pairs; for example, FET/USDT has shown 20% gains on AI hype cycles, with support at $0.50 and resistance at $0.80 based on recent charts. Overall, Collins' insights suggest stablecoins are on the cusp of transforming finance, urging traders to position in resilient assets while hedging against regulatory risks. By focusing on verified on-chain data and market indicators, savvy investors can capitalize on these shifts, potentially yielding substantial returns in a post-bank era.

Michaël van de Poppe

@CryptoMichNL

Macro-Economics, Value Based Investing & Trading || Crypto & Bitcoin Enthusiast