According to @OnchainLens, the wallet labeled Bitcoin OG (10/11) opened a 5x leveraged ETH short worth about $15M. Per @OnchainLens citing hyperbot.network, the position size is 5,000 ETH with an entry price of $3,001.81 and a liquidation level at $5,056.50. Based on the notional reported by @OnchainLens, each 1% move in ETH implies roughly $150,090 in mark-to-market PnL for this short. Based on the $15M notional and 5x leverage reported by @OnchainLens, the implied initial margin is approximately $3.00M. Using the entry and liquidation levels reported by @OnchainLens, the liquidation price sits about 68.4% above entry, defining the risk band for this position. @OnchainLens also notes the trader may increase size further, and monitoring the address via hyperbot.network/trader/0xb317d2bc2d3d2df5fa441b5bae0ab9d8b07283ae could flag any scaling activity reported by @OnchainLens. (Source)

According to @timnitGebru, Emile’s post alleges the Effective Altruism community disregards facts and harasses or threatens critics, framing EA as a dangerous cult, source: @timnitGebru (X, Nov 29, 2025). The source presents no market data, tickers, or cryptocurrency references and includes no quantitative evidence, providing no direct trading signal, source: @timnitGebru (X, Nov 29, 2025). The post offers opinion-led criticism with no cited policy moves, corporate statements, or regulatory actions that would constitute an immediate market catalyst, source: @timnitGebru (X, Nov 29, 2025). (Source)

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a trader referred to as “1011 开空内幕大佬” closed long exposure yesterday and switched to a 5x short on ETH, opening 5,000 ETH at an entry price of $3,001.81 with a reported notional value of approximately $15.02 million; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Nov 29, 2025. The author adds that this appears to be an initial head position and the trader may still be in observation mode; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Nov 29, 2025. (Source)

According to @grok, RSA is highly vulnerable to quantum attacks via Shor's algorithm, while SHA-256 used in Bitcoin hashing only faces Grover's quadratic speedup, which is not a near-term threat to Bitcoin’s proof-of-work security, source: @grok. Bitcoin’s ECDSA signatures are susceptible in principle to sufficiently large-scale quantum computers using Shor’s algorithm, highlighting the need for post-quantum migration paths, source: NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography project; source: @grok. For trading, this implies limited near-term BTC security risk at the hashing level but a longer-horizon signature risk that market infrastructure must plan for, aligning with the assessment that Grover’s speedup is not imminent as a break, source: @grok; source: NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography project. (Source)

According to @AltcoinDaily, BTC is the reserve asset, ETH the internet of value, SOL the consumer engine, ADA the formal-verification chain, and XRP the liquidity bridge, creating a narrative map traders can use to time rotation across BTC, ETH, SOL, ADA, and XRP markets. Source: Altcoin Daily on X, Nov 29, 2025. Using this framework, traders can benchmark BTC dominance and BTC pairs for reserve-asset bids, track ETH/BTC for value-internet flows, watch SOL/ETH for consumer-chain momentum, monitor ADA/BTC for verification-led catalysts, and follow XRP/BTC for cross-border liquidity themes. Source: Altcoin Daily on X, Nov 29, 2025. Position sizing can align with these narratives by prioritizing liquidity shifts and relative strength across the cited pairs rather than treating the labels as guarantees, with entries and exits guided by the narrative each asset is expected to fulfill. Source: Altcoin Daily on X, Nov 29, 2025. (Source)

According to @ki_young_ju, crypto is moving out of a nanny-state environment and the gambling era is ending as value investing focuses on altcoins with real long-term vision, emphasizing lasting value creation for investors and traders, source: @ki_young_ju. According to @ki_young_ju, this view implies rotating capital away from short-term speculative high-beta plays toward projects with durable fundamentals such as clear token economics, sustainable protocol revenue, and regulatory alignment, while extending holding periods, source: @ki_young_ju. According to @ki_young_ju, risk management under this framework favors reducing leverage, sizing positions around fundamental catalysts rather than hype, and validating value creation using on-chain metrics and developer activity, source: @ki_young_ju. According to @ki_young_ju, this stance suggests a market tilt toward selective accumulation of fundamentally stronger altcoins over momentum-only names, making fundamental screening more critical for entries and exits, source: @ki_young_ju. (Source)

According to @jp_mullin888, the project emphasized that "Every $MANTRA starts with $OM," explicitly referencing both tickers on X for visibility. Source: https://twitter.com/jp_mullin888/status/1994653063483986238 The post links to an official MANTRA Chain update, showing coordinated messaging between the MANTRA ecosystem and the OM token without any disclosed price, listing, or tokenomics details. Source: https://x.com/MANTRA_Chain/status/1994647531020849384 For traders, the key fact is the public reinforcement of the $MANTRA–$OM association across official channels, a visibility event rather than a fundamental change. Source: https://twitter.com/jp_mullin888/status/1994653063483986238 (Source)

According to @cz_binance, a contrarian approach is to sell during maximum greed and buy during maximum fear, emphasizing sentiment-driven entries and exits (source: @cz_binance on X, Nov 29, 2025). Traders commonly use the Crypto Fear & Greed Index to identify extremes, with levels above 75 signaling potential profit-taking zones and below 25 signaling potential accumulation zones (source: Alternative.me). Risk controls such as position sizing and stop-loss discipline are standard when applying sentiment strategies to BTC, ETH, and BNB to limit drawdowns (source: CFA Institute). (Source)

According to @CNBC, Airbus has initiated a recall affecting A320 jets after a glitch linked to solar flares led to groundings and disruptions to global travel. source: CNBC @CNBC reports that A320 aircraft groundings are causing worldwide schedule disruptions as affected jets are taken out of service. source: CNBC @CNBC did not provide details on timelines, the number of aircraft affected, or financial impact in the post, and it reported no direct effects on crypto markets. source: CNBC (Source)

According to @FarsideUK, US spot Bitcoin ETFs posted a total net inflow of 71.4 million dollars on 2025-11-28 (source: @FarsideUK, farside.co.uk/btc). By fund, ARKB recorded +88.0M, FBTC +77.5M, GBTC +10.7M, while IBIT saw -113.7M; BITB, BTCO, EZBC, BRRR, HODL, and BTCW were all 0 for the day (source: @FarsideUK). These ETF primary flow figures are presented in US dollars and were published in the Nov 29, 2025 update for the 2025-11-28 session (source: @FarsideUK). (Source)

According to @FarsideUK, BlackRock’s US Bitcoin ETF recorded a daily net outflow of 113.7 million US dollars, indicating net redemptions from the product on the day, source: Farside Investors (@FarsideUK). The figure is part of Farside Investors’ Bitcoin ETF Daily Flow dataset, with full data and disclaimers available on their dashboard, source: Farside Investors (@FarsideUK). (Source)

According to @FarsideUK, Ethereum ETF net flows totaled $76.6 million on 2025-11-28, based on Farside Investors data farside.co.uk/eth. According to Farside Investors, ETHA led the day with a $68.3 million inflow, accounting for roughly 89.2% of net flows farside.co.uk/eth. According to Farside Investors, ETHE posted an $8.3 million inflow (about 10.8% share), while FETH, ETHW, TETH, ETHV, QETH, EZET, and ETH reported zero net flows farside.co.uk/eth. According to Farside Investors, the complex finished the session with a positive aggregate net flow of $76.6 million across Ethereum ETFs farside.co.uk/eth. (Source)

According to @FarsideUK, BlackRock’s US Ethereum ETF recorded a 68.3 million USD daily net inflow, based on Farside Investors’ Ethereum ETF flow tracker at farside.co.uk/eth (source: Farside Investors). According to @FarsideUK, the reported value reflects net creations for the day as defined in the methodology and disclaimers on the Farside Ethereum ETF dashboard at farside.co.uk/eth (source: Farside Investors). According to @FarsideUK, traders can review issuer-level daily and cumulative flows on farside.co.uk/eth to gauge ETH demand via spot ETF activity in the US market (source: Farside Investors). (Source)

According to @OnchainLens, Ethena (@ethena_labs) withdrew 25M ENA valued at approximately $7.05M from Bybit, and the cited wallet 0x631ee55b8ecd7afb53ec30211a082691a4cbe3ae now holds 355.15M ENA valued at about $100.13M, providing concrete on-chain flow data for traders. According to @OnchainLens, the withdrawal represents a 25M-token outflow from Bybit at the time of transfer, with an implied per-token value of roughly $0.282 calculated from the reported figures ($7.05M/25M and $100.13M/355.15M). According to @OnchainLens, the address 0x631ee55b8ecd7afb53ec30211a082691a4cbe3ae is the reference to monitor for any subsequent inflows or redeposits that would update exchange supply conditions for ENA. (Source)

According to @MI_Algos, Bitcoin’s 21-Day SMA is in confluence with the Yearly Open Timescape Level near $93.3K, establishing very strong technical resistance at this area (source: Material Indicators/@MI_Algos on X, Nov 29, 2025). According to @MI_Algos, $93.3K is not unbreakable, but the SMA-Yearly Open overlap increases the likelihood that attempts to push higher will face notable resistance at this level (source: Material Indicators/@MI_Algos on X, Nov 29, 2025). According to @MI_Algos, traders should watch the weekly close, and if RSI remains below 41, there is a high probability of a pullback for another support test before another attempt to break the Yearly Open (source: Material Indicators/@MI_Algos on X, Nov 29, 2025). (Source)

According to Binance, independent data from Chainalysis and TRM indicate that illicit exposure on top centralized exchanges is a few hundredths of 1% (source: Binance announcement citing Chainalysis and TRM). According to Binance, Binance’s illicit exposure is lower than peers and has declined by 96–98% since 2023, based on those third-party datasets (source: Binance announcement citing Chainalysis and TRM). According to Binance, the company has published a detailed security blog outlining how these reductions were achieved at the largest scale for the exchange (source: Binance blog linked in the announcement). According to Binance, these third-party metrics provide concrete figures that traders can reference when assessing exchange compliance risk and venue selection for order routing and liquidity (source: Binance announcement citing Chainalysis and TRM). (Source)

According to Lookonchain, whale address bc1ql5 sold 500 BTC about 9 hours ago for $45.37 million, realizing a loss exceeding $10.5 million, based on on-chain tracking of the transaction, source: Lookonchain. The same address withdrew 500 BTC from Binance on Oct 14 at an implied purchase price of $111,899 per BTC totaling $55.95 million, corroborated by the Arkham Intelligence Explorer address record, source: Lookonchain; source: Arkham Intelligence Explorer. BTC later fell below $81,000 after that withdrawal, negating the attempted buy-the-dip entry, source: Lookonchain. For trading context, the $81,000 print and the $111,899 cost basis are explicit price references from the reported flow and the address history can be monitored on Arkham Intelligence for further movements, source: Lookonchain; source: Arkham Intelligence Explorer. (Source)

According to @lookonchain, Circle minted another 500M USDC, highlighting fresh stablecoin supply entering the market (source: @lookonchain on X, Nov 29, 2025). According to @lookonchain, combined stablecoin issuance by Tether and Circle has reached $18.25B since the 1011 market crash (source: @lookonchain on X, Nov 29, 2025). (Source)

According to @lookonchain, an Ethereum OG wallet deposited 18,000 ETH (about $54.78M) to Bitstamp roughly 8 hours ago; on-chain reference address: 0xBd719AaDc672497B7dcf5D1947B6c2784919c9cE, source: @lookonchain on X. According to @lookonchain, the address accumulated 154,076 ETH since 2017 at a $517 average cost and previously sold 87,824 ETH at a $1,694 average, source: @lookonchain on X. According to @lookonchain, the wallet still holds 66,252 ETH (about $201M) with estimated total profits near $270M, source: @lookonchain on X. According to Glassnode and CryptoQuant research, traders often monitor large exchange inflows as sell-side liquidity, as elevated inflows have historically coincided with increased realized selling on centralized exchanges, sources: Glassnode research; CryptoQuant research. (Source)

According to @OnchainLens, Circle minted $1B USDC on Solana in the past 24 hours and $12.25B since Oct 11 (source: @OnchainLens). This $1B equals about 8.2% of the cumulative mints since Oct 11 and is roughly 4 times the 49 day average pace of about $250M per day, based on the same dataset (source: @OnchainLens). The accelerated minting signals a short term increase in available USDC on Solana; traders can monitor SOL/USDC market depth, DEX liquidity, and spreads to gauge deployment speed (source: @OnchainLens). (Source)