According to @borgetsebastien, The Sandbox Game's 2026 goals are faster publishing, cheaper actions, and smoother discovery to make infrastructure invisible to users, source: @borgetsebastien on X, Jan 4, 2026. The post credits the Messari Q3 2025 report for these insights, source: @borgetsebastien on X, Jan 4, 2026. For traders, these stated 2026 milestones define roadmap metrics to monitor such as user cost per action and content publishing speed, source: @borgetsebastien on X, Jan 4, 2026. No quantitative metrics or implementation dates were disclosed in the post, source: @borgetsebastien on X, Jan 4, 2026. (Source)

According to @StockMKTNewz, this week features a very light US earnings slate, with the broader earnings season resuming next week on Tuesday, January 13, 2026, as flagged in the shared update. Source: @StockMKTNewz on X, Jan 4, 2026. According to @StockMKTNewz, the post references Earnings Hub’s Master Earnings Calendar and points to a list of the most popular stocks set to report during January 5–9, 2026. Source: @StockMKTNewz on X, Jan 4, 2026; @EarningsHubHQ on X https://x.com/EarningsHubHQ/status/2007861172595458307. According to @StockMKTNewz, traders can use the Jan 5–9 roster and the Jan 13 season kickoff as concrete catalyst dates to plan positioning and risk management around individual earnings and index exposure, with dates taken directly from the shared calendar resources. Source: @StockMKTNewz on X, Jan 4, 2026; @EarningsHubHQ on X https://x.com/EarningsHubHQ/status/2007861172595458307. According to the source, there are no crypto-specific details in the posts; any crypto market impact is indirect and not specified by the sources, so crypto traders should treat these dates as broader risk-calendar references rather than direct crypto catalysts. Source: @StockMKTNewz on X, Jan 4, 2026; @EarningsHubHQ on X https://x.com/EarningsHubHQ/status/2007861172595458307. (Source)

According to @CryptoKing_2020, a Solana-powered meme coin named SYSTEM RESET with ticker $RESET has been announced for traders to watch. Source: @CryptoKing_2020 on X, Jan 4, 2026. The post provides a Pump.fun coin page at pump.fun/coin/5HDkTxGuLapLL8D7L2qcdaLdrD8zycR6vMhTKsXJpump and lists the contract address as 5HDkTxGuLapLL8D7L2qcdaLdrD8zycR6vMhTKsXJpump, offering concrete identifiers for on-chain verification. Source: @CryptoKing_2020 on X, Jan 4, 2026. An additional X profile link x.com/PCatteneo is shared as a related handle for updates and social signals. Source: @CryptoKing_2020 on X, Jan 4, 2026. No pricing, liquidity, or exchange listing data are disclosed in the announcement, so the only actionable trading details provided are the Solana contract address and the Pump.fun page. Source: @CryptoKing_2020 on X, Jan 4, 2026. (Source)

According to @StockMKTNewz, Disney’s Avatar: Fire and Ash has officially surpassed $1 billion in global box office receipts, marking Disney’s third $1 billion film of the year and the third entry in the Avatar franchise to reach this milestone (source: @StockMKTNewz on X, citing @TheCineprism). The source did not indicate any direct impact on the cryptocurrency market from this development (source: @StockMKTNewz). (Source)

According to @CryptoMichNL, NEAR (NEAR) rebounded from a recent low at $1.43, which he identifies as the bottom, and has gained more than 20% since then, highlighting renewed bullish momentum, source: @CryptoMichNL on X, Jan 4, 2026. He notes that price is testing a crucial resistance zone at $1.80-2.00, framing it as the key confirmation area for trend continuation, source: @CryptoMichNL on X, Jan 4, 2026. He adds that a decisive break above $2.00 could open a move toward $3 or higher as the next target zone, offering a clear breakout setup for traders, source: @CryptoMichNL on X, Jan 4, 2026. (Source)

According to @CrypNuevo, BTC is unlikely to recover immediately from current levels as the present price action resembles October 2019, source: @CrypNuevo. According to @CrypNuevo, the expected sequence is a liquidity run followed by a sweep of recent lows before any rebound, indicating near-term downside risk into prior lows, source: @CrypNuevo. According to @CrypNuevo, a sweep of the lows could occur with or without an initial liquidity run, keeping the short-term bias cautious until lows are taken, source: @CrypNuevo. (Source)

According to CrypNuevo, a liquidity run is an initial false move engineered to collect liquidity by trapping breakout traders and triggering short stop-losses/liquidations so the subsequent move executes more efficiently; source: CrypNuevo on X, Jan 4, 2026, https://twitter.com/CrypNuevo/status/2007847705146716460. He also highlights that there are additional short liquidations clustered around 96,000 dollars, indicating notable resting liquidity at that level; source: CrypNuevo on X, Jan 4, 2026, https://twitter.com/CrypNuevo/status/2007847705146716460. (Source)

According to @CrypNuevo, price is currently at the mid-range where the 1D50EMA may act as resistance, capping near-term upside and reducing long entries. Source: @CrypNuevo. The analyst notes price could sweep prior lows directly without a liquidity run, raising downside sweep risk for breakout strategies. Source: @CrypNuevo. Given these conditions, the analyst is not taking trades at this level and will wait for one of two predefined triggers, emphasizing a patience phase for risk management. Source: @CrypNuevo. (Source)

According to @ysiu, Anichess’s CHECK token has reached roughly $60 million in fully diluted valuation (FDV) and printed a new all-time high, underscoring momentum in the blockchain gaming segment; source: @ysiu on X, Jan 4, 2026. He adds that the project introduced voluntary refunds aimed at shielding token holders from market volatility, highlighting a user-protection feature alongside the rally; source: @ysiu on X, Jan 4, 2026. He also notes that prior gaming tokens like SAND and AXS launched below $10 million around five years ago, providing historical context for early-stage gaming token valuations; source: @ysiu on X, Jan 4, 2026. (Source)

According to @CryptoCoinCoach, GALA is attempting a breakout from a long descending channel, with bullish continuation favored if price holds above the former channel resistance (source: @CryptoCoinCoach on X). According to @CryptoCoinCoach, a rejection back inside the channel would weaken the recovery attempt and invalidate the upside continuation setup (source: @CryptoCoinCoach on X). According to @CryptoCoinCoach, the detailed chart reference is shared on TradingView to illustrate the descending channel and potential confirmation levels (source: @CryptoCoinCoach on X and TradingView). (Source)

According to @WatcherGuru, Michael Saylor hinted at buying more Bitcoin via the phrase "Orange or Green?" in an X post on Jan 4, 2026 (source: @WatcherGuru on X, Jan 4, 2026). The post provides no details on transaction size, timing, wallet evidence, or an official disclosure, so there is no verifiable buy to incorporate into pricing at this time (source: @WatcherGuru on X, Jan 4, 2026). Traders monitoring BTC should treat this as an unconfirmed signal until an official filing, company announcement, or on-chain proof is presented, as none were cited in the post (source: @WatcherGuru on X, Jan 4, 2026). (Source)

According to @QCompounding, Hermes is the first stock highlighted in a 12 Boring Stocks with Extraordinary Returns list posted on Jan 4, 2026, source: @QCompounding on X, Jan 4, 2026. The post frames Hermes as part of a set of so-called boring stocks associated with extraordinary returns per the list title, source: @QCompounding on X, Jan 4, 2026. The post does not provide a ticker, valuation metrics, or price targets for Hermes, limiting immediate trade calibration, source: @QCompounding on X, Jan 4, 2026. The post does not mention cryptocurrencies or tokenized assets, indicating no direct crypto-market catalyst from this item, source: @QCompounding on X, Jan 4, 2026. (Source)

According to @bobbyong, CoinGecko has the strongest community and both CoinGecko and Jupiter have strong team presence in Malaysia and Singapore, highlighting elite execution in the region; source: @bobbyong on X, Jan 4, 2026. Separately, @_Astro_Cowboy_ reported that CoinGecko remained the #1 Moonbirds SBT minting community, that Jupiter came close, and that the Jupiter mint is now closed; source: @_Astro_Cowboy_ on X, Jan 4, 2026, as cited by @bobbyong. For traders, these posts confirm CoinGecko’s stronger community engagement versus Jupiter during the Moonbirds SBT mint phase and the closure of Jupiter’s mint as a short-term activity driver to monitor; source: @bobbyong and @_Astro_Cowboy_ on X, Jan 4, 2026. (Source)

According to @CryptoMichNL, the BTC vs Gold ratio is starting an uptrend but remains unconfirmed until a higher high is established, which would validate the bullish divergence (source: @CryptoMichNL on X, Jan 4, 2026). According to @CryptoMichNL, broader markets also look strong, reinforcing the improving risk tone he observes (source: @CryptoMichNL on X, Jan 4, 2026). For traders, @CryptoMichNL indicates the key signal to watch is a higher high on the BTC/XAU ratio to confirm the bullish setup (source: @CryptoMichNL on X, Jan 4, 2026). (Source)

According to @OnchainLens, three wallets linked to a single entity spent $3.67M USDC to buy 272,979 LINK at an average price of $13.45 roughly an hour ago (source: @OnchainLens). The reported addresses are 0x1f4f5cf1cca885d831034127106c35ba36199850, 0x482597d809753ebf8dc0103abe6a39466bf079c1, and 0x91957320ecf4fa9e5dd63c58dd2ac8d2842a55f6 (source: @OnchainLens). The disclosed $13.45 cost basis and addresses provide clear reference points for tracking any subsequent on-chain movements by this entity (source: @OnchainLens). (Source)

According to @OnchainLens citing Nansen data, over the past two days address 0x4553e3bc6327006a63c5aa4cdac887f66b6a433e swapped 22,345 ETH (valued at $69.97M) for 774.16 WBTC at a 0.0346 ETH/BTC rate. According to @OnchainLens citing Nansen data, the flows imply an average execution of roughly $3,132 per ETH and about $90,350 per BTC. According to @OnchainLens citing Nansen data, the 0.0346 ETH/BTC level reflects the whale’s average execution anchor across the two-day activity. According to @OnchainLens citing Nansen data, the transactions indicate a shift in on-chain exposure from ETH to BTC via WBTC. (Source)

According to @EmberCN, 22,344 ETH valued at about 70.06 million dollars was swapped into 774.1 WBTC at an average BTC price of 90,505 dollars. Source: @EmberCN on X https://twitter.com/EmberCN/status/2007784662983471112 These figures imply an execution ETH/BTC rate of approximately 0.03465 and an implied ETH price near 3,136 dollars at the time of the swap. Source: @EmberCN on X https://twitter.com/EmberCN/status/2007784662983471112 (Source)

According to @TATrader_Alan, the ETH weekly chart shows a breakout within the right shoulder complex that mirrors the left shoulder, indicating an inverse head-and-shoulders structure on higher timeframe price action (source: @TATrader_Alan on X, Jan 4, 2026). The author states that completing this inverse head-and-shoulders pattern could drive ETH significantly higher, highlighting a bullish technical setup for traders to monitor (source: @TATrader_Alan on X, Jan 4, 2026). (Source)

According to @EmberCN, an ETH whale who began rotating to BTC yesterday swapped another 7,828 ETH, about $24.6M, for 269 WBTC about one hour ago, source: @EmberCN on X, DeBank address debank.com/profile/0x4553e3bc6327006a63c5aa4cdac887f66b6a433e, X post dated Jan 4, 2026 https://x.com/EmberCN/status/2007777853564403911. In total the address has exchanged 21,973 ETH, about $68.9M, into 761.4 WBTC at an average WBTC cost basis of $90,491, leaving only 370 ETH, about $1.16M, remaining, source: @EmberCN on X and DeBank. Yesterday's tranche included selling 14,145 ETH, about $44.3M, for 492 WBTC at a 0.03478 rate with an average WBTC cost of $90,014, source: @EmberCN on X https://x.com/EmberCN/status/2007259884774142068 and DeBank. The wallet originally accumulated 22,344 ETH from centralized exchanges around early 2022 at an average entry of $2,916, per on-chain history shared by @EmberCN, source: @EmberCN on X and DeBank. For traders, the whale's realized WBTC cost basis near $90k is a transparent reference for tracking flow-driven levels on BTC spot and perps that mirror WBTC pricing, source: @EmberCN on X and DeBank. (Source)

According to Lookonchain, Ethereum OG address 0x4553 exchanged 7,828 ETH worth about $24.6M for 269 WBTC in the last 2 hours. Source: x.com/lookonchain/status/2007773071827153154. According to Lookonchain, over the prior 7 hours the same wallet swapped a cumulative 14,146 ETH worth about $44.3M for 492 WBTC at an ETH-to-BTC ratio of 0.03479. Source: x.com/lookonchain/status/2007299299517051382. According to Lookonchain, the address accumulated 21,000 ETH between 2019 and 2023 at an average purchase price of $2,922 totaling about $61.4M, and is converting ETH holdings into BTC. Source: x.com/lookonchain/status/2007299299517051382. According to Arkham Intelligence, the wallet is labeled as 0x4553e3Bc6327006A63C5aA4cdAC887f66b6A433E with transactions visible on the explorer. Source: intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x4553e3Bc6327006A63C5aA4cdAC887f66b6A433E. (Source)